RAYONG / 218 PARTICIPANTS

Performance varies by subgroup

Accuracy in the Rayong Hospital participant study

Overall
93.6%
Poor LV
100%
Good LV
96.9%
Fair LV
27.3%
Rayong study report by the EasyEF team ·Percentages describe this sample, not guaranteed individual or cross-hospital performance.

01

Evaluation in a care setting

This retrospective study helps us understand a workflow combining healthcare professionals, smartphones, and cardiac assessment. Summary findings were presented at the 17th Cardiac Network Forum (CNF) in 2026.

Full publication and peer-review status remain unverified. The findings here are a summary of the Rayong study in its specific setting.

02

Participants and assessment indications

The 218 participants included 76 undergoing pre-chemotherapy assessment and 142 undergoing general LV function assessment. These indications provide two distinct clinical-service populations.

Assessment indicationParticipantsShare of participants
Pre-chemotherapy7635%
General LV function14265%
Total218100%

03

A workflow involving nurses and clinicians

Registered nurses recorded ultrasound displays with smartphone cameras. EasyEF classified LV function as poor, fair, or good, with comparison against assessments confirmed by a cardiologist.

Extending the findings to other services requires considering image quality, device and model versions, and user experience together.

04

Results by ventricular-function category

Overall accuracy was 93.6%, with 100% for poor LV, 96.9% for good LV, and 27.3% for fair LV.

Fair LV is the main limitation requiring further work. The 100% poor LV result applies to this sample; errors remain possible in new populations.

MeasureReported value
Overall accuracy93.6%
poor LV100%
good LV96.9%
fair LV — material limitation27.3%

05

Performance differs between participant groups

Overall accuracy was 98.7% in pre-chemotherapy assessment and 90.8% in general assessment. Separating these results reveals differences hidden by a single overall figure.

Category mix, image quality, and examination conditions need further study to explain the difference. Standard assessment before treatment remains essential.

06

From findings to the next research questions

The Rayong findings sharpen our focus on fair LV and multisite testing, including how AI information might help care teams prioritize further assessment.

Effects on referral reduction need an appropriate study design. Statistical significance thresholds also need reconciliation between the two abstracts before reuse.

SOURCE NOTES

Sources and published project summaries

  1. The cardiac-assessment journey — by the EasyEF team
  2. EasyEF team: project scope and development roadmap

Project content is compiled and published by the EasyEF team from development records, presentations and study reports. Internal links lead to the team’s summaries, not additional independent evidence. Published research links to its original journal; study status and limitations are stated in the relevant articles.

Explore the source library →