RAYONG / 218 PARTICIPANTS
Performance varies by subgroup
Accuracy in the Rayong Hospital participant study
01
Evaluation in a care setting
This retrospective study helps us understand a workflow combining healthcare professionals, smartphones, and cardiac assessment. Summary findings were presented at the 17th Cardiac Network Forum (CNF) in 2026.
Full publication and peer-review status remain unverified. The findings here are a summary of the Rayong study in its specific setting.
References and further reading
02
Participants and assessment indications
The 218 participants included 76 undergoing pre-chemotherapy assessment and 142 undergoing general LV function assessment. These indications provide two distinct clinical-service populations.
| Assessment indication | Participants | Share of participants |
|---|---|---|
| Pre-chemotherapy | 76 | 35% |
| General LV function | 142 | 65% |
| Total | 218 | 100% |
References and further reading
03
A workflow involving nurses and clinicians
Registered nurses recorded ultrasound displays with smartphone cameras. EasyEF classified LV function as poor, fair, or good, with comparison against assessments confirmed by a cardiologist.
Extending the findings to other services requires considering image quality, device and model versions, and user experience together.
References and further reading
04
Results by ventricular-function category
Overall accuracy was 93.6%, with 100% for poor LV, 96.9% for good LV, and 27.3% for fair LV.
Fair LV is the main limitation requiring further work. The 100% poor LV result applies to this sample; errors remain possible in new populations.
| Measure | Reported value |
|---|---|
| Overall accuracy | 93.6% |
| poor LV | 100% |
| good LV | 96.9% |
| fair LV — material limitation | 27.3% |
References and further reading
05
Performance differs between participant groups
Overall accuracy was 98.7% in pre-chemotherapy assessment and 90.8% in general assessment. Separating these results reveals differences hidden by a single overall figure.
Category mix, image quality, and examination conditions need further study to explain the difference. Standard assessment before treatment remains essential.
References and further reading
06
From findings to the next research questions
The Rayong findings sharpen our focus on fair LV and multisite testing, including how AI information might help care teams prioritize further assessment.
Effects on referral reduction need an appropriate study design. Statistical significance thresholds also need reconciliation between the two abstracts before reuse.
References and further reading
SOURCE NOTES
Sources and published project summaries
- The cardiac-assessment journey — by the EasyEF team
- EasyEF team: project scope and development roadmap
Project content is compiled and published by the EasyEF team from development records, presentations and study reports. Internal links lead to the team’s summaries, not additional independent evidence. Published research links to its original journal; study status and limitations are stated in the relevant articles.
Explore the source library →